Pentonym®
Home  ·  Research  ·  AI name collisions
Original research · August 2026

About half the names an AI hands you are already someone’s trademark.

Vibe-coding a startup? The model will happily name it for you. We tested how often those names are actually available — by clearing them against the live US & EU register. Not a survey. Not an estimate. 45 real clearances, each one signed and verifiable below.

The finding

We asked an AI to name 45 startups across three common categories, with no knowledge of trademark status. Cleared against the US & EU register, 23 of 45 (51%) came back Do-Not-Proceed — a live registered mark already bars the name for those goods. The AI optimises for memorable; the register doesn’t care.

51%23 of 45 · US + EU register

The name isn’t the hard part. The clearance is.

An AI can generate a thousand brandable names a minute. What it can’t see is the 14-million-mark register standing behind every one of them. Half of what it suggests is already taken for the goods you’d file in — and you only find out after you’ve bought the domain, printed the cards, and told your friends.

Every number on this page links to a signed receipt · verify any of them yourself

By category

Where the collisions cluster.

Plain-word productivity names collide most; coined AI/dev-tool names fare best — but even the “safest” category is one-in-three taken.

CategoryNamesDo-Not-ProceedRate
Productivity151067%
Fintech15853%
AI / dev tool15533%
All452351%
Method

How we ran it — and what it does not claim.

An AI was prompted to generate brandable names for three ordinary startup categories — a productivity app, a fintech app, and an AI/developer tool — with no instruction to avoid existing marks. Each name was then cleared through Pentonym’s gating screen against the US register (14.1M live marks) and the EUIPO register, for goods matching its category. The verdict is the engine’s register-gating decision: DO_NOT_PROCEED means at least one live mark bars the name for those goods under the identification-controls rule (TMEP §1207.01(d)(v)); PROCEED means the gating registers are clear.

n = 45 · US + EU register · gating screen (register + distinctiveness), network sweep excluded · Aug 2026

What it does not claim. This is a register-gating result, not a full clearance opinion, and not legal advice. A PROCEED here is a green light to investigate further — domains, handles, common-law use and counsel review still apply — not a guarantee of registrability. The 51% is the rate for this sample of 45 AI-generated names on the date shown; it is not a claim about all AI names everywhere. We publish every underlying verdict so you can check our work.

The evidence

All 45 names. Every verdict signed.

This is the whole dataset — nothing dropped. Click any receipt to verify the Ed25519 signature yourself.

NameVerdictSigned receipt
Productivity — “names for a productivity app”
Taskly✓ PROCEEDv_2e44c0140352f2 ↗
Flowdeck● DO NOT PROCEEDv_b090420c714a9d ↗
Zenbox● DO NOT PROCEEDv_0fe976b033b96c ↗
Cadence● DO NOT PROCEEDv_13c513c676c4d0 ↗
Beacon● DO NOT PROCEEDv_35182744d34034 ↗
Tolla● DO NOT PROCEEDv_2f643f1177af98 ↗
Brightwork● DO NOT PROCEEDv_02292472e9540b ↗
Focusly● DO NOT PROCEEDv_0de6c3bf0323c5 ↗
Streamline● DO NOT PROCEEDv_6092dfaad430cb ↗
Notely✓ PROCEEDv_69eb4e45a697a6 ↗
Momentia✓ PROCEEDv_aadf142bb39c7c ↗
Clario● DO NOT PROCEEDv_e31b2b22de4f50 ↗
Loopwork✓ PROCEEDv_f43fd4f819dad3 ↗
Nimbly● DO NOT PROCEEDv_addd68eb746b3e ↗
Deskly✓ PROCEEDv_9cc61d57fb6d63 ↗
Fintech — “names for a fintech app”
Ledgr● DO NOT PROCEEDv_d0507015bdcf33 ↗
Coinly● DO NOT PROCEEDv_d04412b6385bd0 ↗
Paypath● DO NOT PROCEEDv_9f92ca4924db34 ↗
Fundwise● DO NOT PROCEEDv_e63ea79af0a237 ↗
Mintflow✓ PROCEEDv_3e9cf383b1d94b ↗
Denari● DO NOT PROCEEDv_ac1c63e8c5dfb0 ↗
Novabank✓ PROCEEDv_3bb55dec6f3a9a ↗
Stashly✓ PROCEEDv_b6b8d083b04d73 ↗
Equable— INCONCLUSIVEv_e20476911ae02d ↗
Payload● DO NOT PROCEEDv_c607dc18a64136 ↗
Cently✓ PROCEEDv_a3b611af8c271b ↗
Vaultly✓ PROCEEDv_c08d5f49332b8a ↗
Fundr✓ PROCEEDv_cbf39dbdd52c50 ↗
Capsule● DO NOT PROCEEDv_200f1aa3870a5b ↗
Truffle● DO NOT PROCEEDv_ce3e807769a955 ↗
AI / dev tool — “names for a AI dev tool”
Cortexly✓ PROCEEDv_62bc7738fc1018 ↗
Promptly● DO NOT PROCEEDv_0450eddefcc0c5 ↗
Modelic✓ PROCEEDv_e34c45f0b09984 ↗
Inferly✓ PROCEEDv_2328b7bb5cf5d4 ↗
Tokenwise✓ PROCEEDv_3810487109b228 ↗
Vectra● DO NOT PROCEEDv_36894035cb4e3c ↗
Cognita● DO NOT PROCEEDv_b81266e881a9a9 ↗
Runlayer● DO NOT PROCEEDv_ee25ab0956d493 ↗
Embedly✓ PROCEEDv_4260a1d5dc0254 ↗
Weavenet✓ PROCEEDv_f4269eb4e004fc ↗
Chaind✓ PROCEEDv_782519b6f291b4 ↗
Neuronic● DO NOT PROCEEDv_6c39132a5fdba7 ↗
Synaptic✓ PROCEEDv_ebbeffd2f9622a ↗
Deployr✓ PROCEEDv_a43d288ffe194a ↗
Latently✓ PROCEEDv_789a68c0b4d50d ↗
Clear your name — free → Give your AI the clearance tool · API & MCP
Clearance
Trademark clearance Likelihood of confusion Common-law search Nice classification
Tools
Is my name taken? Cost calculator Handle checker
Agents
Naming AI agents Agent Name Census API & MCP Developer docs Partners
Trust
How verification works Public signing key Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Notice
Real verdict · pentonym.app/v1/screen · Ed25519 · signed & independently verifiable a screening signal, not legal advice · US & EU coverage